Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Count from 1-20

One Koala

Two Kangaroos

Three Emu(s)

Four Wombat(s)

Five Swans

Six Dingoes

Seven Kookaburras

Eight Wallabies

Nine Crocodiles

Ten Frilled Neck Lizards

Eleven Galahs

Twelve Seals

Thirteen Green Frogs

Fourteen Fairy Penguins

Fifteen Platypus

Sixteen Crimson Rosella

Seventeen Tasmania Devils

Eighteen Dolphins

Nineteen Echidnas

Twenty Possum

This is a print  of Bartel 

Count From 1- 10

One Lion

Two Hands

Three Birthday Cakes

 Four Guitars

Five Keys

Six Jelly Beans

Seven Ice Creams

Eight Drums

Nine Balloons

Ten Pigs

This is a print of  http://www.bartel.com/

Thursday, September 2, 2010

How NATO can win Afghanistan War

In my view, a lasting war would never be the interest of any country , no matter how strong and rich in a moment. This view is historical and is the essence from experienced ancestors.

The Afghanistan has became a very hard issue for American,  although they have changed several top commanders there's several things I would like to point out:

1> The frustration from Afghanistan, isn't military operation failure of NATO. Militarily, they have achieved their initial target from the beginning of operation.

2> The real failure is factually on the distance between goal and achievement. So that instead of feeling frustrated, they should clear their goal, however, the military goal itself is too political, which has served as a huge trick to NATO army. So said political means there's a hidden goal behind the stated goal, that makes things complicated. However military goal need to be clearly identified as operation targeted.

3> The real failure is political instead of military. As there's simply a historical law, that no win on military operation can last without followed by political wisdom. Such political wisdom means integrity , however politician tricks exists in peace talk losing faith is to lose chance for NATO army. And lasting operation due to integrity loss would eventually cost further lives and resources to further drag any country that's strong enough. And there's never a single example in history, that a country involved in lasting warfare would be economically benefited. So the wise strategy should be withdraw their troop at their win, followed by good policy.

4> Politics that's shifty with hidden nature would bring huge harm, especially with relationship to Islam. As Muslim are people less believe to lies. And more lies kills credibility and chance.And losing the ground of support. These shiftiness including using charity organisation or carry on projects of special nature or ill organised, politics with hidden direction, with cover however without nature-such as using worse quality(harder) powder for humanitarian rescue.So the first thing to solve Afghanistan war, is to use wise politics. However many people do not know what wise politics means, they only know what "skillful" politics means - a generally difference between nature and its cover. Yet they will find its less working to Muslims that have long history of suspicion on US policy. If they are trying to increasing the skill so as people are better cheated, then the fight would be more severe. And this is directly how trick of politician affecting the army.
If they continue to ruin any chance of peace negotiation, then there would be no chance for the army to pull back to maintain its success at peak. However as things develops naturally, peak would always followed by decline - as confined by available resources and soilders' will . Military operation should be scientific, as condition confines, the military commanders should clearly know the possibility of win a war, and it's not wise to fight a war that's hard to win. However the greed of politicians  always want more, without realising such limitation. This is the conflict and complication directly caused by politics that proven to be impractical.

5> So the huge complication exists in NATO politician and army goals. As my suggestion, they should fix their clear goal into achievable scope. However as their initial operation has been successful, a second success is purely a political need. But if it's still not being followed by lasting politics there would never be any chance of win. Here the win is not of pure military meaning, it's political in nature. But militarily, pull the troops back is their first priority. As military action is to serve the best interest of a country.

6> Lately there has been lots distraction from internal NATO army. Disorder, murder to high ranking defence officers and generals would clearly further weaken their own army strength, however there's nothing new replaced. It's set on the way of loss further. The situation is directly related with power freak of personal interest, to sacrifice their army interest and national interest. The situation involved with sexual bribery, biological attacks and threats and smear campaigns organised by hidden ambitious party for further power than they should have legally.